This week (10/16, 18) I
held a critique with the students for their Gradient Design projects and then
taught a new lesson on Op Art.
I did the “Good Cop, Better Cop” critique
again so the students could improve in the process. We began class by discussing the rubric so that the students
would know what to look for in critiquing the works they were assigned. I had all the artwork out on the center
tables and asked students to take a walk around to look at all of them. Then they went to their good cop piece
and wrote down two good things about it in their sketchbooks. After a couple minutes, I had
them switch and do the same with their better cop piece, noting what could be
improved. Then I projected each
piece on the board and had the two students assigned to it come up and talk
about what they wrote down.
I struggled with time management with this
critique. I commented too much on
the first pieces to be projected and not enough on the last ones because I was
trying to fit more in, but still there were four pieces left at the end that
were not critiqued. It was okay
because Mr. Powell said he would finish the critique with them the next day,
but I still need to work on that.
The reason I spent so much time on the first pieces is because I was
trying to continue training the students to use art language. I think it was a valuable experience
for some of them, and I saw some improvement from the first critique I had with
them, which was exciting. Every
critique can’t take two days though, so spreading the time out evenly between
each work is necessary. I could
probably take some time from the beginning where I explained the rubric and had
the students walk around as the students become more familiar with the
process.
I also had some students in the back of
the classroom who were not fully engaged in the critique when they weren’t
presenting. While other students
were talking about a piece I just gave stern looks to the ones chatting and
that worked for a little while, but I had to repeat that tactic a few
times. It made me wonder if I
should have addressed it more. I
also wondered if it would be better to bring stools up to the front in an arc
so that students could see better and maybe that would keep them more engaged
in the discussion.
My Op Art lesson went really well, and it
was a really fun day to teach! The
students were interested in the lesson, answered my questions well, and asked
some really good questions of their own.
I spent more time on the “lecture” portion than I planned on, but I felt
like it was really valuable time for them, so I didn’t want to rush
through. We talked about what Op
Art is, what artists have to think about to make it, and two Op Art artists: Victor
Vasarely and Bridget Riley. Then I
introduced the project and walked through an example process with them for a
practice piece.
I spent a lot of time planning this lesson
and creating the PowerPoint presentation because I got excited about teaching
it, and I could definitely tell during the lesson. The information came out of me without my having to think
about it much, and I was able to enjoy interacting with the students without
worrying about what was coming next.
I even wore a black and white patterned dress because it reminded me of
Op Art; I think I’m becoming an art teacher!